NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Milich v The Council of the City of Canterbury (No. 2) [2012] NSWSC 450 Hearing dates: 30 May 2012 Decision date: 31 July 2012 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: The parties should bring in Short Minutes. Catchwords: TORTS - negligence - work injury - worker takes proceedings against employer and another person - both defendants found liable - whether employer entitled to indemnity under s 151Z - whether principle in Public Transport Commission v J Murray-More applicable - Plaintiff with compensable and non-compensable injuries - extent of indemnity - employer paid compensation believing all injuries compensable - whether compensation paid should be apportioned between compensable and non-compensable injuries for purposes of indemnity Legislation Cited: Workers Compensation Act 1987 Cases Cited: Cobcroft v Aggcon Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 1287 Fox v Wood (1981) 148 CLR 438 Franklins Self Serve Pty Ltd v Wyber [1999] NSWCA 390 I&J Foods Pty Ltd v Bergzam Pty Ltd (Court of Appeal - unreported - 9 April 1997; (1997) 14 NSWCCR 486 J Blackwood & Son v Skilled Engineering [2008] NSWCA 142 Milich v The Council of the City of Canterbury [2012] NSWSC 59 Public Transport Commission of NSW v J Murray-More (NSW) Pty Ltd (1975) 132 CLR 336 Williams v Twynam Agricultural Group Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 1098 Category: Separate question Parties: Branislav (Bill) Milich (Plaintiff) The Council of the City of Canterbury (First Defendant) Ready Workforce Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) Representation: M Boulton (Plaintiff) R Sheldon SC (First Defendant) P O'Connor (Second Defendant) Watkins Tapsell (Plaintiff) DLA Phillips Fox (First Defendant) Holman Webb Lawyers (Second Defendant) File Number(s): 2008/315064
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate