NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Bank of Western Australia Limited v O'Brien [2012] NSWSC 456 Hearing dates: 02/05/2012 Decision date: 02 May 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Commercial List Before: McDougall J Decision: Plaintiff entitled to summary judgment. Parties to bring in orders. Catchwords: GUARANTEE AND INDEMNITY - enforcement of guarantees - whether bank entitled to judgment in accordance with guarantees - whether suspension of rights clauses effective - whether defendants can seek relief under s 12GM of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) - whether, as a matter of construction, suspension clauses preclude the bringing of the cross-claims relying on federal law. Legislation Cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) Cases Cited: Agar v Hyde (2000) 201 CLR 552 Bitannia Constructions Pty Limited v Parkline Constructions Pty Limited (2006) 67 NSWLR 9 Capital Finance Australia Limited v Davies [2002] NSWSC 1146 Capital Finance Australia Limited v Air Star Aviation Pty Limited (2004) 1 Qd R 122 Daewoo Australia Pty Limited v Porter Crane Imports Pty Limited [2000] QSC 950 Dey v Victorian Railway Commissioners (1949) 78 CLR 62 and Esanda Finance Corporation Limited v Peat Marwick Hungerford (1997) 188 CLR 241 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (New South Wales) (1964) 112 CLR 125 St George Bank Limited v Field [2007] NSWSC 902 Webster v Lampard (1993) 177 CLR 598 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Bank of Western Australia Limited (ACN 050 494 454) (Plaintiff/First Cross-Defendant) Rory Francis O'Brien (First Defendant/First Cross-Claimant) Bakota Holdings Pty Ltd (ACN 050 060 583) (Second Defendant/Second Cross-Claimant) Representation: Counsel: P J Dowdy (Plaintiff/First Cross-Defendant) R A Yezerski (Defendants/First and Second Cross-Claimants) Solicitors: Ashurst Australia (Plaintiff/First Cross-Defendant) Eakin McCaffery Cox (Defendants/First and Second Cross-Claimants) File Number(s): 2011/229400
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate