NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Leighton International v Hodges; Thiess v Reinforced Earth [2012] NSWSC 458 Hearing dates: 01/05/2012 Decision date: 02 May 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: McDougall J Decision: Leighton v Hodges: application dismissed. Thiess v Reinforced Earth: parties to complete discovery under existing orders. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - Practice Note SC Eq 11 - disclosure - where parties seek an order for disclosure before service of evidence - existing proceedings - whether Practice Note SC Eq 11 discharges, abrogates or varies existing discovery orders - whether exceptional circumstances - whether disclosure necessary - meaning of "exceptional circumstances" and "necessary" - whether making of disclosure orders consistent with s 56 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Evidence on Commission Act 1995 (NSW) Judicature Act 1873 Practice Note SC Eq 11 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Armstrong Strategic Management and Marketing Pty Limited & Ors v Expense Reduction Analysts Group Pty Limited & Ors [2012] NSWSC 393 Commonwealth v Miller (1910) 10 CLR 472 Gerard Cassegrain & Co Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 241 R v Kelly [2000] 1 QB 198 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: 2011/137985 Leighton International Limited (First Plaintiff) Leighton Offshore Pte Ltd (Second Plaintiff) Leighton Holdings Limited (Third Plaintiff) Gavin John Hodges (Defendant) 2011/185835 Thiess Pty Ltd (First Plaintiff) Hochtief Aktiengesellschaft (Second Plaintiff) Reinforced Earth Pty Ltd (First Defendant) GHD Pty Ltd (Second Defendant/Cross-Claimant) Ward Civil and Environmental Engineering Pty Ltd (Third Defendant) Parsons Brinckerhoff Australia Pty Limited (Cross-Defendant) Representation: 2011/137985 G J Hatcher SC (Plaintiffs) J C Giles (Defendant) 2011/185835 Counsel: C J Starkey (Solicitor) (Plaintiff) F G Kalyk (First Defendant) V A La Fontaine (Solicitor) (Second Defendant/Cross-Claimant) T C Seton (Solicitor) (Third Defendant) R N Krikiorian (Solicitor) (Cross-Defendant) Solicitors: 2011/137985 Herbert Geer (Plaintiffs) Bennett + Co (Defendant) 2011/185835 Minter Ellison (Plaintiffs) Norton Rose Australia (First Defendant) HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Second Defendant) Colin Biggers & Paisley (Third Defendant) Middletons (Cross-Defendant) File Number(s): 2011/137985 and 2011/185835
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate