NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: D'Amore v Independent Commission Against Corruption [2012] NSWSC 473 Hearing dates: 2 April 2012 Decision date: 14 May 2012 Before: McClellan CJ at CL Decision: 1. The summons is dismissed. 2. I order the plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - jurisdictional error - whether the states of satisfaction referred to in ss 13(3A) and 9(5) of the Independent Commission Against Corruption Act 1988 are jurisdictional facts - states of satisfaction held to be jurisdictional facts
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - jurisdictional error - judicial review on "no evidence" grounds - judicial review for illogicality or irrationality in jurisdictional fact-finding - whether the Commission's findings of "corrupt conduct" were affected by jurisdictional error - whether the Commission purported to make findings of jurisdictional fact for which there was no evidence, or no rationally probative evidence - Commission held not to have fallen into jurisdictional error - summons dismissed Legislation Cited: Independent Commission Against Corruption Act 1988 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] HCA 33; (1990) 170 CLR 321 Avon Downs Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1949] HCA 26; (1949) 78 CLR 353 Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 34; (1938) 60 CLR 336 Commissioner of Police v Ryan [2007] NSWCA 196; (2007) 70 NSWLR 73 Corporation of the City of Enfield v Development Assessment Commission [2000] HCA 5; (2000) 199 CLR 135 Enfield City Corporation v Development Assessment Commission [2000] HCA 5; (2000) 199 CLR 135 Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v Ryan [2002] HCA 54; (2002) 211 CLR 540 Greiner v Independent Commission Against Corruption (1992) 28 NSWLR 125 Kirk v Industrial Relations Commission (NSW) [2010] HCA 1; (2010) 239 CLR 531 Kostas v HIA Insurance Services Pty Ltd [2010] HCA 32; (2010) 241 CLR 390 L & B Linings Pty Ltd v Workcover Authority of New South Wales [2012] NSWCA 15 Lu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2004] FCAFC 340; (2004) 141 FCR 346 M70/2011 v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] HCA 32; (2011) 85 ALJR 891 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40; (1986) 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16; (2010) 240 CLR 611 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6; (1996) 185 CLR 259 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30; (2001) 206 CLR 323 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Durairajasingham [2000] HCA 1; (2000) 168 ALR 407 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v SGLB [2004] HCA 32; (2004) 78 ALJR 992 Minister for Immigration v Eshetu [1999] HCA 21; (1999) 197 CLR 611 Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth [2003] HCA 2; (2003) 211 CLR 476 Question of Law Reserved (No 2 of 1996) [1996] SASC 5674; (1996) 67 SASR 63 R v Australian Stevedoring Industry Board; Ex parte Melbourne Stevedoring Co Pty Ltd [1953] HCA 22; (1953) 88 CLR 100 R v Dytham [1979] QB 722 R v Hillier [2007] HCA 13; (2007) 228 CLR 618 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Applicant S20/2002 [2003] HCA 30; (2003) 77 ALJR 1165 Secretary of State for Education and Science v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council [1977] AC 1014 Timbarra Protection Coalition Inc v Ross Mining NL [1999] NSWCA 8 (1999) 46NSWLR 55 Weal v Bathurst City Council [2000] NSWCA 88 Wood v R [2012] NSWCCA 21 Texts Cited: Aronson, Dyer and Groves, Judicial Review of Administrative Action (4th ed, 2009) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Angela D'Amore (Plaintiff) Independent Commission Against Corruption (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: B W Walker SC/R R Tripodi (Plaintiff) J T Gleeson SC/A M Mitchelmore (Defendant) Solicitors: Thompson Eslick Solicitors (Plaintiff) Crown Solicitor (Defendant) File Number(s): 2011/138619
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate