NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Inspector Scott Rand v Toffy Pty Ltd t/as ABC Tyrepower and Mechanical [2012] NSWIRComm 39 Hearing dates: 30 March 2012 Decision date: 02 April 2012 Before: Kavanagh J Decision: ORDERS 1. I find the defendant guilty. 2. The defendant is fined in the sum of $65,000 with a moiety to the WorkCover Authority of New South Wales. 3. The defendant shall pay the prosecutor's costs. As to the quantification of costs, I will hear the parties on this issue in the event no agreement is reached. Leave to relist at short notice. Catchwords: OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY - breach under s 8(1) - amended application for order - guilty plea - corporate defendant - vehicle car tyre business -lift designed to move stock from ground floor to the mezzanine level - errors in design of lift installed - no proper risk assessment undertaken - hoist not approved or certified or registered to carry personnel - personnel using lift when incident occurred - no professional maintenance programme for lift - unsafe system of work in place - foreseeable element to the offence - breach serious - simple remedial steps available - safe system of work now in place - periodic maintenance check and repair of machinery now performed - elements specific of general deterrence in consideration of penalty - risk most serious - early plea - no prior convictions - discount on penalty - compliance with WorkCover Authority - defendant corporation of good character - unlikely to re-offend - corporation of limited means for the purposes of penalty - penalty to reflect objective seriousness of offence - penalty - moiety to prosecutor - costs Legislation Cited: Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Cases Cited: ACCC v Safeways Stores Pty Limited (1997) ATPR 41-562 Capral Aluminium Ltd v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales [2000] NSWIRComm 71; (2000) 49 NSWLR 610 Corbett v Borg, unreported judgment of Hungerford J dated 15 May 1996 Lawrenson Diecasting Pty Limited v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (Inspector James Swee Ch'ng) (1999) 90 IR 464 Markarian v R [2005] HCA 25; (2005) 215 ALR 213; (2005) 228 CLR 357 Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59 Moore v E.W. Co (1990) 37 IR 145 Morrison v Powercoal Pty Limited [2003] NSWIRComm 416; (2003) 130 IR 364 Pearce v Queen (1998) 72 ALJR 1416 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Thomson; R v Houlton [2000] NSWCCA 309; (2000) 49 NSWLR 383; (2000) 115 ACrimR 104 Warman v WorkCover (1998) 80 IR 326 WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (Inspector Ankucic) v McDonalds Australia Limited (2000) 95 IR 383 WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (Inspector Ch'ng) v ACI Operations Pty Ltd, unreported decision of Schmidt J dated 25 February 1994 WorkCover v Waugh (1995) 52 IR 89 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Inspector Scott Rand (Prosecutor) Toffy Pty Ltd t/as ABC Tyrepower and Mechanical (Defendant) Representation: A Searle of counsel (Defendant) WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (Prosecutor) Jordan Djundja Lawyers (Defendant) File Number(s): IRC 825 of 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate