NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kahlefeldt Securities Pty Limited v Guruparan [2012] NSWSC 476 Hearing dates: 3 May 2012 Decision date: 11 May 2012 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Harrison J Decision: Application dismissed with costs Catchwords: PROCEDURE - judgments and orders - amending, varying and setting aside -application by second defendant to have judgment and consent orders set aside pursuant to UCPR 36.15(1) and 36.16(2)(c) or pursuant to the Court's inherent jurisdiction - application dismissed with costs Legislation Cited: Contracts Review Act 1980 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: AVS Australian Venue Security Services Pty Ltd v Criminale [2006] NSWCA 368 Coles v Burke (1987) 10 NSWLR 429 D'Orta-Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid [2005] HCA 12; (2005) 223 CLR 1 First Mortgage Managed Investments Ltd v Oberlechner [2006] NSWSC 1397 Kendell v Carnegie [2006] NSWCA 302; (2006) 68 NSWLR 193 Provident Capital Ltd v Norton [2012] NSWSC 17 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Kahlefeldt Securities Pty Limited (Plaintiff) Sivasupiramaniam Guruparan (First Defendant) Christina June Inbamalar Guruparan (Second Defendant) Representation: G George (Plaintiff) M J Dawson (Second Defendant) Gadens Lawyers (Plaintiff) Blackstone Waterhouse Lawyers (Defendants) File Number(s): 2005/263786
Judgment 1HIS HONOUR: The second defendant moves the Court for orders pursuant to a notice of motion filed on 27 April 2012.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate