NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Urriola v Regina [2012] NSWCCA 95 Hearing dates: 26 March 2012 Decision date: 17 May 2012 Before: Beazley JA at [1]; Harrison J at [54]; McCallum J at [55] Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal against sentence; 2. Appeal allowed in part; 3. Remit the matter to the trial judge for re-sentence in respect of the offence charged in count 2: supply of a commercial quantity of cocaine contrary to the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985, s 25(2). Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - Application for leave to appeal against sentence - Crimes Act 1900, s 349 - Accessory after the fact to murder - Sentencing - Whether sentence manifestly excessive
CRIMINAL LAW - Application for leave to appeal against sentence - Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985, s 25(2) - Sentencing - Whether sentencing judge erred by failing to impose a non-parole period in relation to the second count in accordance with Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, s 45(1) - Matter remitted to trial judge for re-sentencing in accordance with Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, s 45(1) - Appeal allowed in part Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Firearms Act 1996 Poisons and Therapeutic Goods Act 1966 Cases Cited: Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194; 205 A Crim R 1 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520 Hristovksi v R [2010] NSWCCA 129 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Postlewaight v R [2011] NSWCCA 279 R v Almirol (No 2) [2007] NSWSC 323 R v Faulkner [2000] NSWSC 944 R v Galea [2003] NSWSC 465 R v Morgan (1993) 70 A Crim R 368 R v Tait (1979) 24 ALR 473; 46 FLR 386 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Marcelo Urriola (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: I McClintock SC (Applicant) S Bowers (Respondent) Solicitors: Mark Klees and Associates (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2009/156643; 2009/157948 Publication restriction: No Decision under appeal Citation: R v Marcelo Urriola Date of Decision: 2010-04-30 00:00:00 Before: Fullerton J File Number(s): 2009/156643
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate