NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Rado v Carrapetta [2012] NSWCA 143 Hearing dates: 7 May 2012 Decision date: 07 May 2012 Before: Tobias AJA Decision: (a) The appeal be expedited with liberty to the parties to approach the Registrar forthwith with a view to obtaining a date for hearing. (b) The application for security for costs be dismissed with costs. [Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.] Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Appeal - Application for expedition unopposed - Contract - inability to raise totality of funds to complete purchase - security for costs. Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules r 51.50(1) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Margaret Ann RADO (applicant) Frank Charles CARRAPETTA; Lucy Maree CARRAPETTA; Denise Amber CARRAPETTA (respondents) Representation: Counsel: M Hadley (applicant) R Parsons (respondents) Solicitors: Schweizer Kobras (applicant) V L Macri Lawyers (respondents) File Number(s): 2012/95244 Decision under appeal Citation: Margaret Ann Rado v Frank Charles Carrapetta & Ors Date of Decision: 2012-02-27 00:00:00 Before: Nicholas J File Number(s): 2012/30874
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate