NSW Caselaw
Administrative Decisions Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: A & A Palk v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2012] NSWADT 94 Hearing dates: 10 February 2012 and 3 March 2012 Decision date: 18 May 2012 Jurisdiction: Revenue Division Before: A Verick, Judicial Member Decision: The assessment for the land tax year 2009 is confirmed. Catchwords: Land tax - whether land exempt as land used for primary production - breeding bees in hives on land - significant use of land for residential purposes - whether the dominant use was "use for the maintenance of animals" - whether applicants failed the dominant use test Legislation Cited: Land Tax Management Act 1956 Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Taxation Administration Act 1996 Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW) Cases Cited: Kearry v Pattinson [1939] 1 All E R 65 Stormer v Ingram (1978) 21 SASR 93 Babaniaris v Luton Fashion Pty Ltd (1987) 71 ALR 225 Project Blue Sky v ABA (1998) 194 CLR 355 Cooper Brooks (Wollongong) Pty Ltd v FCT (1981) 35 ALR 151 Burnside & Marrakai Limited v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1955-1959) 11 ATD 181 R v Philbey 48 SJ 216 Reysson Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (RD) [2009] NSWADTAP 17 Greenville Pty Limited v Commissioner of Land Tax (NSW) 7 ATR 30 Saville v Commissioner of Land Tax (1980) 81 ATC 4373 Stephen v Federal Commissioner of Land Tax (1930) 45 CLR 122 Randwick Corporation v Rutledge (1959) 2 CLR 54 Pizzitola v Galverston County Central Appraisal District 808 S.W. 2nd 244 (Tex. App.-Houstan [1st Dist.] 1991) Tutton and others v A D Walter Ltd (1985) 3 All ER 757 Leda Manorstead v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2010] NSWSC 867 Cornish Group Pty Limited & Anor v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2009] NSWADT 191 Hope v Bathurst City Council (No 2) (1983) 52 LGRA 79 Hope v Bathurst City Council (1986) 7 NSWLR 669 Thomason v Chief Executive, Department of Lands (1994-1995) 15 QLCR 286 Leda Manorstead Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2011] NSWCA 366 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Allan and Angela Palk (Applicants) Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (Respondent) Representation: Counsel N Bilinsky, (Applicants) AH Rider, (Respondent) B Bilinsky (Applicants) Crown Solicitor (Respondent) File Number(s): 096100
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate