NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Tweed Shire Council v Sikiric (No 2) [2012] NSWLEC 119 Hearing dates: 24 May 2012 Decision date: 24 May 2012 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Sheahan J Decision: 1. The defendant is found guilty of, and convicted of, contempt of orders 4 and 5 made by me on 9 December 2011. 2. The defendant is fined $18,000, plus a penalty of $2,000 per week until all chickens and poultry sheds have been removed. 3. The weekly penalty in Order 2 is suspended until 3 June 2012. 4. My Orders 6 and 7 of 9 December 2011, regarding costs of the proceedings and storage of materials, are affirmed. 5. The defendant is ordered to pay Council's costs incurred since 1 January 2012 on an indemnity basis. 6. The exhibits are returned. 7. The Council is given liberty to apply on 72 hours notice in respect of these orders. Catchwords: CONTEMPT: Plea of Guilty - principles to apply - conviction and fine - weekly penalty pending total compliance - indemnity costs Cases Cited: Burwood Council v Ruan [2008] NSWLEC 167 Environment Protection Authority v Ramsey Food Processing Pty Ltd (No 4) [2011] NSWLEC 246 Tweed Shire Council v Sikiric [2011] NSWLEC 240 Wollongong City Council v Kilpatrick (No 2) [2012] NSWLEC 98 Category: Sentence Parties: Tweed Shire Council (Prosecutor) Dean Sikiric (Defendant) Representation: Mr M R Hall, barrister Mr P Trout, barrister Sparke Helmore Lawyers (Prosecutor) Solon Lawyers (Defendant) File Number(s): 40825 of 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate