NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Hoatson Maxwell (No. 1) Pty Limited [2012] NSWSC 563 Hearing dates: 7 May 2012 Decision date: 07 May 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Corporations List Before: Black J Decision: Argument that statutory demand should be set aside for defect in supporting affidavit not open to applicants. Matter listed for argument as to whether a genuine dispute exists as to the debt the subject of the statutory demand. Costs reserved. Catchwords: CORPORATIONS - Winding up - Statutory demand - Application to set aside statutory demand on the basis of defect in supporting affidavit. Legislation Cited: - Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 459G, 459G(3), 459H, 459J - Federal Court Rules (Cth) o 71 r 36B - Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000 - Supreme Court (Corporations) Rules 1999 Cases Cited: - Austech Institute for Further Education Pty ltd v Britt [2010] NSWSC 56 - Callite Pty Ltd v Adams [2001] NSWSC 52 - David Grant & Co Pty Ltd (rec apptd) v Westpac Banking Corporation [1995] HCA 43; (1995) 185 CLR 265; 18 ACSR 225 - Faji (Australia) Constructions Pty Ltd v AC Professional Accounting Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 180 - Graywinter Properties Pty Ltd v Gas & Fuel Corp Superannuation Fund (1996) 70 FCR 452; 21 ACSR 581 - Hansmar Investments Pty Ltd v Perpetual Trustees Co Ltd [2007] NSWSC 103; (2007) 61 ACSR 321 - Independent Portable Buildings Pty Ltd v Modular Building Systems Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 511 - POS Media Online Ltd v B Family Pty Ltd [2003] NSWSC 147; (2003) 21 ACLC 533 - Saferack Pty Ltd v Marketing Heads Australia Pty Ltd [2007] NSWSC 1317 - Tatlers.com.au Pty Ltd v Davis [2007] NSWSC 835 - V & M Davidovic Pty Ltd v Professional Services Group Pty Ltd (t/as Rosier Partners Lawyers) [2012] NSWSC 134 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Hoatson Maxwell (No. 1) Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Rae's Graphic Signs Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J. Merewether (solicitor) (Plaintiff's agent) C. Simpson (Defendant) Solicitors: Penmans Solicitors (Plaintiff) Somerville Laundry Lomax (Defendant) File Number(s): 12/58993
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate