NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Fitzpatrick Investments Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council [2012] NSWLEC 1133 Hearing dates: 8 May 2012 Decision date: 25 May 2012 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dixon C Decision: (1)The appeal is upheld. (2)Development consent DA07/1856 is modified by the deletion of condition 65(b). (3)The exhibits are returned. Catchwords: Modification application - the deletion of a condition of a development consent requiring the registration of a s 88B instrument on the title of each lot of a subdivision; the condition was imposed to protect and maintain trees; is the condition unnecessary and/or inappropriate in circumstances where tree removal already requires the council's consent. Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Conveyancing Act 1919 Blacktown Local Environmental Plan, 1998 Blacktown Development Control Plan 2006 Cases Cited: Arkibuilt Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council [2006] NSWLEC 502 Antoun v Wollondilly Shire Council (2009) NSWLEC 1308 BTG Planning v Blacktown City Council [2008] NSWLEC 1500 Charles Family Kindergarten Limited v Council of the City of Sydney [2006] NSWLEC 590 Hillpalm Pty Limited v Heaven's Door Pty Limited (204) 220 CLR 472 Telstra Corporation Limited v Hornsby Shire Council (2006) 146LGERA 10 Walton v Blacktown City Council [2006] NSWLEC 451 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Fitzpatrick Investments Pty Limited (Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate