NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Gebara v R [2012] NSWCCA 107 Hearing dates: 25 May 2012 Decision date: 25 May 2012 Before: Basten JA at 33 Hoeben JA at 34 McCallum J at 1 Decision: Leave granted to appeal against sentence. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME - sentence - aggravated armed robbery - whether sentencing judge erred in failing to give adequate consideration to contents of medical reports - whether erred in failing properly to distinguish applicant's role from that of his co-offenders - whether erred in characterising offences as being more serious than the category of offence considered in the Henry guideline judgment. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Cases Cited: Johnson v R; Moody v R [2010] NSWCCA 124 R v Baker [2000] NSWCCA 85 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 436 Yang v R [2012] NSWCCA 49 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Khaled Gebara (applicant) Crown (respondent) Representation: W Flynn (applicant) F Veltro (Crown) Mitry Lawyers (applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2010/139133 2010/139153 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2011-02-04 00:00:00 Before: Knox DCJ File Number(s): 2010/139133 2010/139153
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate