NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Scott Alan May v Regina [2012] NSWCCA 111 Hearing dates: 20 October 2011 Decision date: 31 May 2012 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; Simpson J at [342]; Harrison J at [417] Decision: (1) Appeal against conviction allowed, conviction quashed. (2) Verdict of acquittal entered. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - conviction - evidence - whether verdict unreasonable on evidence CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - conviction - joint criminal enterprise - whether misdirection in summing up to jury - whether extended joint criminal enterprise alternative should have been left to jury CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - conviction - whether misdirection in summing up to jury - whether evidence capable of verifying key witness's account CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - conviction - joint criminal enterprise - whether manslaughter alternative should have been left to jury Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 s 5 Criminal Appeal Rules r 4 Criminal Code (Cth) s 11.5 Director of Public Prosecutions Act 1986 s 19 Evidence Act 1995 Pt 3 Div 7 Listening Devices Act 1984 Surveillance Devices Act 2007 Cases Cited: Conway v R [2002] HCA 2; (2002) 209 CLR 203 Gillard v R [2003] HCA 64; (2003) 219 CLR 1 Handlen v R [2011] HCA 51; (2011) 283 ALR 427 Johns v R [1980] HCA 3; (1980) 143 CLR 108 M v R [1994] HCA 63; (1994) 181 CLR 487 MacAuliffe v R [1995] HCA 37; (1995) 183 CLR 108 MFA v R [2002] HCA 53; (2002) 213 CLR 606 Osland v R [1998] HCA 75; (1998) 197 CLR 316 R v Kanaan [2005] NSWCCA 385; (2005) 64 NSWLR 527 R v LK [2010] HCA 17; (2010) 241 CLR 177 R v Mills [1963] 1 QB 522; (1962) 47 Cr App Rep 49 R v Milton [2004] NSWCCA 195 R v Ngo [2003] NSWCCA 82 R v Tangye (1997) 92 A Crim R 545 R v Taufahema [2006] NSWCCA 152; (2006) 162 A Crim R 152 R v Taufahema [2007] HCA 11; (2007) 228 CLR 232 RR v R [2011] NSWCA 235 SI v R [2007] NSWCCA 181 SKA v R [2011] HCA 13; (2011) 243 CLR 400 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Scott Alan May (Appellant) Regina (Crown) Representation: Mr T Game SC; Mr D Barrow (Appellant) Mr D Arnott SC; Ms T Smith (Crown) The Law Practice (Appellant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2007/4832 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2008-06-04 00:00:00 Before: Rothman J File Number(s): 2007/4832
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate