NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Agius; R v Abibadra; R v Jandagi; R v Zerafa [2012] NSWSC 639 Hearing dates: 7 June 2012 Decision date: 12 June 2012 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Simpson J Decision: The Crown will be permitted to call Ms Franco in reply in order to give evidence in accordance with her statement dated 6 June 2012 (Voir dire exhibit 3). Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - jury trial - application by Crown to adduce evidence in reply - principles on which Crown permitted a case in reply. Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: Shaw v The Queen [1952] HCA 18; 84 CLR 265 R v Frank Christopher Lawrence, unreported, NSWCCA, 12 October 1980 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Robert Francis Agius (Accused) Regina (Crown) Carol Abibadra (Accused) Regina (Crown) Deborah Judith Jandagi (Accused) Regina (Crown) Kevin Zerafa (Accused) Representation: P Neil SC/S McNaughton (Crown) I Barker QC/P Coady (Agius) D Jordan (Abibadra) K Averre (Jandagi) P Hastings QC (Zerafa) Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Eddy Neumann Lawyers (Agius) Brown Wright Stein (Abibadra/Jandagi/Zerafa) File Number(s): 08/245425 and others Publication restriction: .
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate