NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Metals Trading Pty Ltd v Doctor Scrap Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] NSWSC 642 Decision date: 01 June 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Rein J Decision: 1. Plaintiff to have order for costs in its favour on its claim. 2. Cross claimant to have an order for costs in its favour on its cross claim. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - costs - departing from the general rule - order for costs on indemnity basis - conduct of parties - misconduct, etc - in proceedings - conduct of case - where party has pleaded a defence which it then abandons at trial - abandonment of a defence does not itself support order for indemnity costs
PROCEDURE - costs - departing from the general rule - Supreme Court procedure - New South Wales - UCPR r 42.34(1) costs order not to be made unless Court satisfied proceedings in appropriate court - where proceedings transferred to Supreme Court to avoid claim being restricted by jurisdictional limit of District Court on quantum - bringing of proceedings in Supreme Court was warranted - exception in UCPR r 42.34(2) applies Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 District Court Act 1973 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Baillieu Knight Frank (NSW) Pty Ltd v Ted Manny Real Estate Pty Ltd (1992) 30 NSWLR 359 Colgate-Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FCR 225 FAI General Insurance Co Ltd v Burns [1996] NSWCA 177 Lahoud v Lahoud [2006] NSWSC 126 Category: Consequential orders Parties: Metals Trading Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Doctor Scrap Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J Hynes (Plaintiff) J Baxter (Defendant) Solicitors: Minter Ellison (Plaintiff) Anderson Lawyers (Defendant) File Number(s): SC 2010/106818
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate