NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Ly v Ly [2012] NSWSC 643 Hearing dates: 29 May 2012 Decision date: 29 May 2012 Before: Rein J Decision: 1. Defendant holds his 30% interest in the property at Canley Heights on trust for the plaintiff. 2. Plaintiff to reimburse the defendant in the sum of $8000. 3. Defendant to pay 80% of the plaintiff's costs as assessed or agreed. 4. Amount of $8000 due from the plaintiff to the defendant to be offset against the costs assessed as payable by the defendant to the plaintiff. Catchwords: EQUITY - trusts and trustees - implied trusts - constructive trusts - where co-owner of a property fails to contribute to mortgage repayments and other necessary expenses - that co-owner holds his interest in the property on constructive trust for the co-owner who has made those payments
REAL PROPERTY - general principles - incidents of estates and interests in land - joint tenancy and tenants in common - where beneficial to first co-owner that the second co-owner vacate the property - allowance should be made for notional rent that first co-owner would have paid
PROCEDURE - judgments and orders - satisfaction and set-off of judgments - where defendant has indicated that he has no money to pay any amounts sought from him - plaintiff entitled to have her judgment debt to the defendant set-off against the costs order in her favour Cases Cited: Luke v Luke (1936) 36 SR (NSW) 310 Muschinski v Dodds (1985) 160 CLR 583 Ryan v Dries [2002] NSWCA 3 The State of Western Australia v Bowman (Supreme Court of Western Australia, Sanderson M, 11 November 1997, unreported, BC9706022) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Kim Soy Ly (Plaintiff) Kim Tap Ly (Defendant) Representation: Kim Soy Ly (Plaintiff in person) Kim Tap Ly (Defendant in person) File Number(s): SC 2011/263671
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate