NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Hurstville City Council v Minister for Planning and Infrastructure [2012] NSWLEC 134 Hearing dates: 6 - 7 March 2012 Decision date: 12 June 2012 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Pain J Decision: 1.The Applicant's amended summons filed on 9 November 2011 is dismissed. 2. Costs are reserved. Catchwords: JUDICIAL REVIEW - construction and interpretation - challenge to approval of concept plan under Part 3A Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 - whether owner's consent provided in accordance with Part 3A requirements - whether procedural fairness accorded to local council Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Pt 3A (repealed), Pt 4 s 77 (repealed) s 78A Environmental Planning and Assessment Amendment (Part 3A Repeal) Act 2011 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 cl 8A, cl 8D, cl 8F, cl 49 Cases Cited: Alcan (NT) Alumina Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Territory Revenue [2009] HCA 41; (2009) 239 CLR 27 Annetts v McCann [1990] HCA 57; (1990) 170 CLR 596 Applicant VEAL of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] HCA 72; (2005) 225 CLR 88 Becton Corporation Pty Ltd v Minister for Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources [2005] NSWLEC 197 Botany Bay City Council v Minister of State for Transport & Regional Development [1996] FCA 1507; (1996) 66 FCR 537 Calardu Penrith Pty Ltd v Penrith City Council [2010] NSWLEC 50 Commissioner for Australian Capital Territory Revenue v Alphaone Pty Ltd [1994] FCA 1074; (1994) 49 FCR 576 Cooper Brookes (Wollongong) Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1981] HCA 26; (1981) 147 CLR 297 Cranky Rock Road Action Group v Cowra Shire Council [2006] NSWCA 339; (2006) 150 LGERA 81 Drake-Brockman v Minister for Planning [2007] NSWLEC 490; (2007) 158 LGERA 349 FAI Insurances Ltd v Winneke [1982] HCA 26; (1982) 151 CLR 342 Geelong Community for Good Life Inc v Environment Protection Authority (EPA) [2008] VSC 185; (2009) 20 VR 338 Greengate Consulting (NSW) Pty Ltd t/as Greengate Property Group v Ashfield Municipal Council [2008] NSWLEC 253; (2008) 162 LGERA 247 Haoucher v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1990] HCA 22; (1990) 169 CLR 648 Harvey v Minister Administering the Water Management Act 2000 (2008) 160 LGERA 50 Hillpalm Pty Ltd v Tweed Shire Council [2002] NSWLEC 17; (2002) 119 LGERA 86 IGS Enterprises Pty Ltd v Hornsby Shire Council [2008] NSWLEC 304; (2008) 164 LGERA 424 IW v City of Perth [1997] HCA 30; (1997) 191 CLR 1 Jonah Pty Ltd v Pittwater Council [2006] NSWLEC 99; (2006) 144 LGERA 408 Kioa v West [1985] HCA 81; (1985) 159 CLR 550 Mulyan Pty Ltd v Cowra Shire Council [1999] NSWLEC 212; (1999) 105 LGERA 26 North Sydney Council v Ligon 302 Pty Ltd [1996] HCA 20; (1996) 185 CLR 470 at 477 Plaintiff M61/2010E v Commonwealth of Australia; Plaintiff M69 of 2010 v Commonwealth of Australia [2010] HCA 41; (2010) 243 CLR 319 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal [1998] HCA 28; (1998) 194 CLR 355 Rivers SOS Inc v Minister for Planning [2009] NSWLEC 213; (2009) 178 LGERA 347 Saeed v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] HCA 23; (2010) 241 CLR 252 SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] HCA 63; (2006) 228 CLR 152 Tugun Cobaki Alliance Inc v Minister for Planning [2006] NSWLEC 396 Wilson v State Rail Authority of New South Wales [2010] NSWCA 198; (2010) 78 NSWLR 704 Texts Cited: DC Pearce and RS Geddes, Statutory Interpretation in Australia, 7th ed (2010) LexisNexis Butterworths Category: Principal judgment Parties: Hurstville City Council (Applicant) Minister for Planning and Infrastructure (First Respondent) Earljest Pty Limited (Second Respondent) Henlia No. 24 Pty Limited (Third Respondent) Representation: Mr R Lancaster SC (Applicant) Mr A Shearer (First Respondent) Mr J Doyle (Second Respondent) (submitting appearance) Mr T Robertson SC with Mr J Lazarus (Third Respondent) Norton Rose Australia (Applicant) Department of Planning and Infrastructure (First Respondent) Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie (Second Respondent) (submitting appearance) Bartier Perry (Third Respondent) File Number(s): 40931 of 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate