NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Zitserman v Waverley Council [2012] NSWLEC 1161 Hearing dates: 15 May 2012 Decision date: 16 May 2012 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Brown ASC Decision: 1. The appeal is upheld. 2. Development Application No. DA/-599/2011 for the demolition of all improvements and construction of 2 dwellings buildings with subdivision at 17 Wonderland Avenue Tamarama is approved subject to the conditions in Annexure A. 3. The exhibits are returned with the exception of exhibit A. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: demolition of the existing residential flat building and the construction of two dwellings and the subdivision of the dwellings - no issues pressed by the council - resident objections - floor space ratio - height - loss of views Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Cases Cited: Tenacity Consulting v Warringah [2004] NSWLEC 140 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Allanah Zitserman (Applicant) Waverley Council (Respondent) Representation: Mr N Eastman, barrister (Applicant) Ms C Morton, solicitor (Respondent) Solicitors Gadens Lawyers(Applicant) Sparke Helmore (Respondent) File Number(s): 10241 of 2012
Judgment 1ACTING SENIOR COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against the deemed refusal by Waverley Council of DA 599/2011 for the demolition of the existing residential flat building and the construction of two dwellings and the subdivision of the dwellings into Lots 1 and 2 at 17 Wonderland Avenue Tamarama (the site). 2The Statement of Facts and Contentions categorised the proposed development as a dual occupancy development however the categorisation was amended by the council to the erection of two dwellings on the subdivided lots with a zero setback between the dwellings.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate