NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Karl Suleman Enterprizes Pty Ltd (in liquidation) v Philip Viet Dzung Pham [2012] NSWSC 645 Hearing dates: 13 June 2012 Decision date: 22 June 2012 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Beech-Jones J Decision: Appeal allowed, see [86]. Catchwords: APPEAL: - decision of Associate Justice - leave previously granted to amend pleading - application under s 1325(2) of Corporations Act - form of pleading - limitation period - case management - appeal allowed - amendments disallowed. Legislation Cited: Civil Aviation (Carriers' Liability) Act 1959 (Cth) s 34 Civil Procedure Act 2005 ss 64 and 65 Corporations (New South Wales) Act 1990 s 7 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 9, 58AA, 79, 1325, 1337B, 1400 Corporations (Ancillary Provisions) Act 2001 (Cth) Corporations Law Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 79 Limitation Act 1969 Supreme Court Act 1970 s 75A Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 82, 87 Trade Practices Amendment Act (No 1) 2001 (Cth) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 r 49.4 Cases Cited: Agtrack (NT) Pty Ltd v Hatfield [2005] HCA 38; (2005) 223 CLR 251 Air Link Pty Ltd v Paterson [2002] NSWCA 85 Air Link Pty Ltd v Paterson (No 2) [2003] NSWCA 251; (2003) 58 NSWLR 388 Air Link Pty Ltd v Paterson [2005] HCA 39; (2005) 223 CLR 283 Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd v Larcos (1987) 13 NSWLR 286 Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australia National University [2009] HCA 27; (2009) 239 CLR 175 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Pegasus Leveraged Options Group Pty Ltd [2002] NSWSC 310; (2002) 41 ACSR 561 BP Australia Ltd v Brown [2003] NSWCA 216; (2003) 58 NSWLR 322 Carbotech-Australia Pty Ltd v Yates [2008] NSWSC 540 Carey-Hazell v Getz Bros & Co (Aust) Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 703; (2001) 112 FCA 336 Gordon v Tolcher [2006] HCA 62; (2006) 231 CLR 334 Interline Hydrocarbon Inc v Brenzil Pty Ltd [2006] QSC 184 Karl Suleman Enterprizes Pty Ltd (in Liq) v Philip Viet Dzung Pham [2011] NSWSC 1405 Komatsu Marketing Support Australia Pty Ltd v Marsh Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 163 PSL Industries Ltd v Simplot Australia Pty Ltd [2003] VSCA 7; (2003) 7 VR 106 Sent v Jet Corp of Australia Pty Ltd [1986] HCA 35; (1986) 160 CLR 540 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Karl Suleman Enterprizes Pty Ltd (in Liquidation) (Plaintiff) Philip Viet Dzung Pham (First Defendant) Nedelkja Borak (Second Defendant) Pham & Associates Pty Ltd (Fourth Defendant) Pham Atic Pty Ltd (Fifth Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Ashhurst SC with S Duggan (Plaintiff) D R Pritchard SC with M Newton (First, Fourth & Fifth Defendants) N Maley (Solicitor) (Second Defendant) Solicitors: Swaab Attorneys (Plaintiff) HWL Ebsworth (First, Fourth & Fifth Defendants) Gilchrist Connell (Second Defendant) File Number(s): 2002/069495
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate