NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Bird v Bird (No 3) [2012] NSWSC 647 Hearing dates: 6 March 2012 Decision date: 06 March 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Rein J Decision: The plaintiff's motion dismissed. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - Supreme Court procedure - New South Wales - leave to amend pleadings - where plaintiff's motion brought at commencement of hearing - where amendments make fresh claims against fourth defendant - where plaintiff has been on notice for a long time of those claims - where plaintiff has in the past stated in pleadings that relief is not sought against fourth defendant - where fourth defendant, now deceased, has not been given an opportunity to defend herself - amendment would be to the prejudice of the defendants Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Cases Cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27; (2009) 239 CLR 175 Dennis v Australia Broadcasting Corporation [2008] NSWCA 37 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Deborah Michelle Bird (Plaintiff) Warrick Lindsay Bird (First defendant) Rodney David Bird (Second defendant) Herbert James Cannington (Third defendant) Mona Ethel Bird (Fourth defendant) Representation: Counsel: J S Drummond (Plaintiff) D E Grieve QC and M K Condon (First and second defendants) C Champion (Third defendant) Solicitors: Wilson & Co Lawyers (Plaintiff) Hills Solicitors (First and second defendants) Middletons (Third defendant) File Number(s): SC 2005/262267
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate