NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: BT v R [2012] NSWCCA 128 Hearing dates: 8 June 2012 Decision date: 10 July 2012 Before: McClellan CJ at CL at [1] Johnson J at [2] Adamson J at [3] Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal. 2. Order that the appeal be dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence appeal - sexual assault offences - whether sentence manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: - Crimes Act 1900 Cases Cited: - Muldrock v R [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 124 - R v Hemsley [2004] NSWCCA 228 - R v Wilson [2005] NSWCCA 219 - R v Wright (1997) 93 A Crim R 48 Category: Principal judgment Parties: BT (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: C Smith (Applicant) PG Ingram SC (Respondent) Solicitors: Legal Aid NSW (Applicant) S Kavanagh (Solicitor for Public Prosecutions) (Respondent) File Number(s): 2009/45312; 2009/152326 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2010-06-18 00:00:00 Before: Ellis DCJ File Number(s): 2009/45312; 2009/152326
Judgment 1McCLELLAN CJ at CL: I agree with Adamson J. 2JOHNSON J: I agree with Adamson J. 3ADAMSON J: On 18 June 2010, the applicant (BT) was sentenced after plea of guilty to the following three counts: (1)Aggravated indecent assault, contrary to s 61M of the Crimes Act 1900, which carries a maximum penalty of seven years imprisonment and a standard non-parole period of five years; (2)Aggravated sexual intercourse inflicting actual bodily harm, contrary to s 61JA of the Crimes Act, which carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment and a standard non-parole period of fifteen years; (3)Sexual intercourse without consent, contrary to s 61I of the Crimes Act, which carries a maximum penalty of fourteen years imprisonment and a standard non-parole period of seven years. 4The standard non-parole periods did not apply to the applicant as he was under the age of 18 years at the time of the offences: s 54D(3) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999; BP v R [2010] NSWCCA 159; 201 A Crim R 379 at 388 [36]. 5In respect of count 3 he was sentenced to a term of 5 ½ years, with a three-year non-parole period to date from 3 March 2009. In respect of count 1 he was sentenced to a term of 2 ½ years with a one-year non-parole period to date from 3 March 2011. In respect of count 2, he was sentenced to a term of eight years with a three-year non-parole period. The total term for all three offences is ten years with a five-year non-parole period, with the applicant eligible to apply for release to parole on 2 March 2014. 6Counts 1 and 2 occurred within the same period on the evening of 7 - 8 March 2009. Count 3 occurred in a separate incident on the following evening, 8 March 2009. 7The applicant seeks leave to appeal on two grounds: first, that the sentence imposed on count 2 is manifestly excessive; and secondly, that the total effective sentence is excessive.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate