NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lockrey v Historic Houses Trust of New South Wales [2012] NSWSC 654 Hearing dates: 7 June 2012 Decision date: 15 June 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Commercial List Before: Stevenson J Decision: Consent to assignment was not unreasonably withheld Catchwords: LANDLORD AND TENANT - Retail and commercial tenancies - retail lease - joint tenancy - transfer of lease - whether assignment of lease - consent to assignment from one joint tenant to the other - whether consent can be withheld Legislation Cited: Housing Act 1985 (UK) Real Property Act 1900 Retail Leases Act 1994 Cases Cited: Burton v Camden London Borough Council [2000] 2 AC 399 Indian Taj Pty Ltd (in liq) v Gilany [2004] NSWSC 1249 Shepherd v Felt & Textiles of Australia Ltd (1931) 45 CLR 359 Texts Cited: Bradbrook, Croft and Hay, Commercial Tenancy Law, 3rd ed (2009) Butt, Land Law, 6th ed (2010) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Paul Lockrey (plaintiff) Historic Houses Trust of New South Wales (first defendant) Ramy Shelhot (second defendant) Representation: Counsel: P Folino-Gallo and A Poljak (plaintiff) J Darams (first defendant) Solicitors: Sydney Law Practice (plaintiff) Eakin McCaffery Cox (first defendant) Bartier Perry (second defendant) File Number(s): SC 2012/75059 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate