NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Artazan Property Group P/L v City of Sydney Council [2012] NSWLEC 1164 Hearing dates: 16-18 April 2012 Decision date: 18 June 2012 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: O'Neill C Decision: 1. The appeal is upheld. 2. Development Application No D/2011/566 for an extension of an existing sex premises is approved subject to the conditions in Annexure A and the Plan of Management in Annexure B. 3. The exhibits are returned except for exhibits 1, 8, 9, 10, A and J. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: extension of existing brothel, appropriateness of location, FSR, parking and traffic impacts and the public interest and weight to be given to the draft LEP. Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Cases Cited: AJA Trading Pty Ltd v Waverley Council [2005] NSWLEC 253 Jonah Pty Limited v Pittwater Council [2006] NSWLEC 99 ROI Properties Pty Ltd v Council of the City of Sydney [2001] NSWLEC 1023 Schaffer Corporation v Hawkesbury City Council (1992) 77 LGRA 21 Terrace Tower Holdings Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council (2003) NSWCA 289 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Artazan Property Group (Applicant) Sydney City Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel Mr Peter Tomasetti SC (Applicant) Ms Sandra Duggan SC (Respondent) Solicitors Henry Davis York (Applicant) City of Sydney Council (Respondent) File Number(s): 10946 of 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate