NSW Caselaw
Administrative Decisions Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Roy v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2012] NSWADT 120 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 19 June 2012 Jurisdiction: General Division Before: S Montgomery, Judicial Member Decision: 1. The decision under review is set aside. 2. The decision is made that the document entitled "Standard Operating Procedures Stationary Speed Enforcement - LIDAR & RADAR" dated March 2007 is to be released to the Applicant. 3. This order is to take effect 28 days from the date of this decision Catchwords: Access to information - information affecting responsible and effective government - information affecting law enforcement and security Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 Cases Cited: Attorney-General's Department v Cockcroft (1986) 10 FCR 180; 64 ALR 97 Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force v Camilleri (GD) [2012] NSWADTAP 19 Desmond v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2003] NSWADT 231 Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1979] AATA 179; (1979) 46 FLR 409. Flack v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police [2011] NSWADT 286 Johnston v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force (GD) [2008] NSWADTAP 82 Johnston v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2008] NSWADT 191 Leech v Sydney Water Corporation [2010] NSWADT 298 Neary v State Rail Authority [1999] NSWADT 107 RT v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police [2005] NSWADT 270 Searle Australia Pty Ltd v Public Interest Advocacy Centre (1992) 36 FCR 111; 16 AAR 281; 108 ALR 163. UC v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police [2005] NSWADT 272 XZ v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2009] 11 NSWADTAP 2 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Peter Roy Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force Representation: Peter Roy (Applicant in person) C Tipene, (Respondent) File Number(s): 113252 Publication restriction: S75 of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act applies to paragraph 66 which is not to be released to the Applicant or the public
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate