NSW Caselaw
Administrative Decisions Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Gani v Maiolo (No 2) (RLD) [2012] NSWADTAP 21 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 20 June 2012 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel - Internal Before: M Chesterman, Deputy President Decision: The Appellant is to pay the Respondents' costs of the appeal, as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: Retail shop lease - costs of appeal - 'substantial disparity' between the relative strengths of the parties' cases Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Retail Leases Act 1994 Cases Cited: ACN 079830595 Pty Ltd t/as Jolly Joe's Fish 'n' Chips v Wallis Lake Fisherman's Co-operative Pty Ltd (No 2) [2010] NSWADT 253 Gani v Maiolo [2011] NSWADT 219 Gani v Maiolo (RLD) [2012] NSWADTAP 10 Jonamill Pty Ltd v Alramon Pty Ltd (No 2) (RLD) [2010] NSWADTAP 3 Meriton Properties Pty Ltd v DCM Leases-Five Pty Ltd (No 2) [2010] NSWADT 11 Rucom Pty Ltd and Anor v Multiplex & Ors [2010] NSWADT 1 Category: Costs Parties: Mohammad Murul Gani (Appellant) Maria Maiolo and Raffaele Maiolo (Respondents) Representation: Counsel M Rollinson (Appellant) M Tibbey (Respondents) Karam C Ramrakha & Associates (Appellant) L Muriniti & Associates (Respondents) File Number(s): 119047 Decision under appeal Citation: Gani v Maiolo [2011] NSWADT 219 Date of Decision: 2011-09-14 00:00:00 Before: Retail Leases Division File Number(s): 105144
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate