NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Cassar v Network Ten Pty Limited [2012] NSWSC 680 Hearing dates: 21 March, 30 April, 25 May 2012 Decision date: 22 June 2012 Before: Hislop J Decision: 1. The amended summons is dismissed. 2. The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs of the application other than the costs of the defendant's application to reopen the evidence. Catchwords: Defamation - extension of limitation period - plaintiff unaware of publication within limitation period - would have become aware of the publication on reasonable inquiry- extension refused. Legislation Cited: Limitation Act 1969 Defamation Act 2005 Cases Cited: Noonan v MacLennan [2010] QCA 50; [2010] 2 Qd R 537 Rayney v The State of Western Australia (No 3) [2010] WASC 83 Ahmed v Harbour Radio Pty Limited [2010] NSWSC 676 Carey v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2010] NSWSC 709, (2010) 77 NSWLR 136 Ritson v Gay and Lesbian Community Publishing Limited [2012] NSWSC 483 Wookey v Quigley (No 2) [2010] WASC 209 Han v The Australian Kung Fu (Wu She) Federation Inc [2011] VSC 498 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jacob Cassar (Plaintiff) Network Ten Pty Limited (Defendant) Representation: T. Molomby SC/J. Reimer (Plaintiff) J. Hmelnitsky (Defendant) Conditsis & Associates (Plaintiff) Ashurst Australia Lawyers (Defendant) File Number(s): 2012/21034
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate