NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Lou TASICH [2012] NSWDC 96 Hearing dates: 13-15, 18-22, 25-26 June 2012 Decision date: 15 June 2012 Before: Knox SC DCJ Decision: Applications for stay of proceedings and judge alone trial are rejected. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - procedure - adjournment, stay of proceedings or order restraining proceedings - stay of proceedings - issue estoppel in criminal trials - prior findings on credibility: whether implicit in jury verdict - abuse of process - juries - judge alone trials - allegations against public officials - public confidence in justice system: jury verdict where prior inquisitorial proceedings Legislation Cited: Independent Commission Against Corruption Act 1988 Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Cases Cited: Gilham v R [2007] NSWCCA 323; (2007) 73 NSWLR 308 Island Maritime Ltd v Filipowski [2006] HCA 30; (2006) 226 CLR 328 Mraz v R (No 2) (1956) 96 CLR 62 R v Storey (1978) 140 CLR 364 R v Belghar [2012] NSWCCA 86 Rogers v R [1994] HCA 42; (1994) 181 CLR 251 R v GSR [2011] NSW DC 17; (2011) 12 DCLR (NSW) 193 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Mr Lou Tasich (Accused) Representation: Mr P Wagstaff (Crown) Mr G D Wendler (Accused) NSW Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Hermann & Green Solicitors (Accused) File Number(s): 2009/00246101
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate