NSW Caselaw
Administrative Decisions Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Mohammady v Christofi [2012] NSWADT 122 Hearing dates: 30 November 2011 and 22 December 2011 Decision date: 22 June 2012 Jurisdiction: Retail Leases Division Before: D Bluth Judicial Member Decision: 1.The Respondents to pay to the Applicant the sum of $2,450.00 as compensation for loss of stock and garments. 2.The Respondents to pay to the Applicant the sum of $8,417.00 by way of abatement of rent. 3.The Respondents to pay 50% of the Applicant's costs as are agreed or assessed upon a party/party basis Catchwords: Covenant for quiet enjoyment ss33, 34 & 36 of Retail Leases Act, 1994 Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Retail Leases Act 1994 Cases Cited: Bonzali v Ersoy (No.2) [2010] NSW ADT 132 Duarte & Ors v Mitchell & Ors [2007] NSW ADT 276 Martins Camera Corner Pty Ltd v Hotel Mayfair Ltd (1976) 2 NSW LR p15 Plant v Meriton Properties Pty Ltd (No.2) [2010] NSW ADT AP20 Spathis v Hanave Investment Co Pty Ltd & Anor (2002) NSW SC 304 Spuds Surf Chatswood Pty Ltdv PT Ltd (RLD) [2012] NSW ADTAP 2 Telstra Corporation Ltd v Sicard [2009] NSWSC 827 Texts Cited: Halsbury's Laws of England, 3rd Ed Category: Principal judgment Parties: Abdul Razul Mohammady (Applicant) Elizabeth and George Christofi (Respondent) Representation: Dehsabzi Lawyers (Applicant) G Xylas (Respondents) File Number(s): 115012
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate