Bristrol Custodians Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2012] NSWADT 123

Administrative Decisions Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Bristrol Custodians Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2012] NSWADT 123 Hearing dates: 30 May 2012, 5 June 2012 Decision date: 22 June 2012 Before: Judge K P O'Connor, President Decision: The review applicant's application under s 58(4) of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 for a notice to produce further documents that may be relevant to the determination is refused. Catchwords: STATE REVENUE - Interlocutory application by review applicant for further documents - Administrator's obligation to produce all documents relevant to the determination of the review application - Scope - Application Refused - Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Duties Act 1997 Taxation Administration Act 1996 Cases Cited: AAT Case 10, 122 (unreported, 11 April 1995) Bausch v Transport Accident Commission (unreported, 3 December 1996) Chief Commissioner of State Revenue v Paspaley [2008] NSWCA 184 KLGL and QCYY and Australian Prudential Regulation Authority [2008] AATA 452 Pacific General Securities Ltd & Anor v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2003] NSWADT 183 Re Spicer Axle Structural Components Australia Pty Ltd and Secretary, Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources (2005) 83 ALD 104 Re Thomas Cook Australia Pty Ltd and Collector of Customs (1994) 34 ALD 301 Schiffer v Pattison [2001] FCA 1094 Transport Accident Commission v Bausch [1998] 4 VR 249 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Bristrol Custodians Ltd (Applicant) Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (Respondent) Representation: Counsel I Young (Applicant) A Rider (Respondent) Leonard Legal (Applicant) Crown Solicitor's Office (Respondent) File Number(s): 116094 Publication restriction: Order under s 75(2) of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997: that paragraphs [57-59] and [68-73] of these reasons only be disclosed to the respondent and the respondent's legal representatives; and otherwise not disclosed or published to the applicant or any other person, without the consent of the respondent.