NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Currell v Baldock; Estate of Currell [2012] NSWSC 705 Hearing dates: 6 June 2012 Decision date: 06 June 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Probate List Before: White J Decision: Refer to para [89] of judgment. Catchwords: WILLS, PROBATE AND ADMINISTRATION - wills - construction of a will - whether deceased intended for document, without more, to operate as her will - whether deceased understood requirements of Succession Act 2006, s 8 - effect of informal alterations to wills - whether inference as to intention of deceased affected by absence of any initialling or authentication of informal amendments - held deceased intended latest testamentary instrument to form will
WILLS, PROBATE AND ADMINISTRATION - wills - grant of probate - where multiple informal documents written in hand of deceased - no revocation clause in later will - later wills prevail over earlier ones to extent of any inconsistencies - consideration of extent to which prior wills have been revoked - probate granted of will of deceased comprising of two instruments
WILLS, PROBATE AND ADMINISTRATION - wills - construction of will - whether words of gift or statement of intention - question as to the nature of the gift made - words of will conferring right of residence - gift as conferring only a conditional right of residence Legislation Cited: Succession Act 2006 Wills, Probate and Administration Act 1898 Cases Cited: Hatsatouris v Hatsatouris [2001] NSWCA 408 In the Estate of Masters (decd); Hill v Plummer (1994) 33 NSWLR 446 Bell v Crewes [2011] NSWSC 1159 Estate of Francis Collins [2000] NSWSC 407 Perrin v Morgan [1943] AC 399 White v Arizon Pty Ltd [2003] NSWSC 1051 Stevenson v Myers (1929) 47 WN (NSW) 94 Texts Cited: Geddes, Rowland and Studdert, Wills, Probate and Administration Law in New South Wales Category: Principal judgment Parties: Tanya Lee Currell (1st Plaintiff) Elizabeth Jean Thompson (2nd Plaintiff) Lynette Fae Baldock (1st Defendant) Joy Maree de Martini (2nd Defendant) Debra Anne Phipps (3rd Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D V Robinson (Plaintiffs) D L Warren (Defendants) Solicitors: Lyons Barnett Kennedy (Plaintiffs) Newman & Pengilly (Defendants) File Number(s): 2011/415782
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate