NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Chandler; Chandler v R [2012] NSWCCA 135 Hearing dates: 8 June 2012 Decision date: 28 June 2012 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1] Basten JA at [2] Hoeben JA at [10] McClellan CJ at CL at [100] Johnson J at [101] Decision: Crown appeal dismissed. Grant leave to appeal to the applicant but dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - Crown appeal against sentence - robbery and assault with intent to rob offences - whether sentencing judge erred in his approach to issue of mental illness - offender with lifelong mental illness problems - relevance of specific and general deterrence - abuse of drugs and mental illness both contributing to commission of offences - sentences imposed not manifestly inadequate - APPEAL against sentence by applicant - parity - considerations relevant to operation of parity principle - different sentencing judges - whether later sentencing judge should go behind findings of earlier sentencing judge - whether sentencing judge should go behind exercise of prosecutorial discretion to examine parity of treatment with regard to co-offenders charged with different offences - whether that issue properly arose on facts - no scope for operation of parity principle. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 - s59(2), s94, s97(1), s99, s154A(1)(b), s349, Criminal Appeal Act 1912 - s55D Cases Cited: Dwayhi v R; Bechara v R [2011] NSWCCA 67; 205 A Crim R 274 El Jalkh v R [2011] NSWCCA 236 Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd [2007] HCA 22; 230 CLR 89 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen [2011] HCA 49, 86 ALJR 36 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Jimmy v R [2010] NSWCCA 60; 77 NSWLR 540 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 OM v R [2009] NSWCCA 267 R v Green and Quinn [2010] NSWCCA 313; 207 A Crim R 148 R v Hemsley [2004] NSWCCA 228 R v Henry & Ors [1999] NSWCCA 111; 46 NSWLR 346 R v Israil [2002] NSWCCA 255 R v Kerr [2003] NSWCCA 234 R v Nguyen, R v Pham [2010] NSWCCA 238, 205 A Crim R 106 Regina v Z [2006] NSWCCA 342; 167 A Crim R 436 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina - Applicant/Respondent Benjamin Chandler - Respondent/Applicant Representation: Counsel: Mr P Ingram SC/ Ms T Smith/Mr P Wallis - Appellant/Respondent Crown Dr JB Berwick/Mr AJP Reynolds - Respondent/Appellant Solicitors: S Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions - Appellant/Respondent Crown B Sandland, Legal Aid NSW - Respondent/Appellant File Number(s): 2009/44437 2010/156698 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2011-11-08 00:00:00 Before: Armitage DCJ File Number(s): 2009/044437 2010/156698
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate