NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Owners Corporation Strata Plan 72535 v Brookfield [2012] NSWSC 712 Hearing dates: 14/06/2012 and 15/06/2012 Decision date: 29 June 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Technology and Construction List Before: McDougall J Decision: Plaintiff has benefit of warranties implied by the Home Building Act against each defendant. Neither defendant owes plaintiff a common law duty of care. Catchwords: [BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION] - strata titles - whether development was adapted for commercial use as a tourist holiday or overnight accommodation - whether owners corporation is entitled to the benefit of the statutory warranties implied under the Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) - whether appropriate for a trial judge to determine a common law duty of care owed to an owners corporation - whether defendants owed a common law duty of care.
[PROCEDURE] - civil - interlocutory issues - severability of issues - whether court should order the separate and prior determination of issues proposed by the notices of motion - leave sought to withdraw admission - whether admission is contrary to the actual facts - whether interests of justice favour application for leave being granted - no question of principle.
[WORDS AND PHRASES] - dwelling. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) Home Building Regulation 2004 Strata Schemes (Freehold Development) Act (1973) Strata Schemes Management Act 1996 (NSW) Cases Cited: Astley v Austrust Ltd (1999) 197 CLR 1 Bryan v Maloney (1995) 182 CLR 609 Maile v Rafiq [2005] NSWCA 410 Mount Albert Borough Council v Johnson [1972] NZLR 234 (CA) NM Rural Enterprises Pty Ltd v Rimanui Farms Limited [2010] NSWSC 969 Tepko Pty Ltd v Water Board (2001) 206 CLR 1 Woolcock Street Investments Pty Limited v CDG Pty Limited (2004) 216 CLR 515 Texts Cited: Dictionary of the English Language, first quarto edition, 1820 Oxford Dictionary of the Australian Language (second edition, 2004) Category: Principal judgment Parties: The Owners - Strata Plan 72535 v Brookfield (Plaintiff) Brookfield Australia Investments Limited (First Defendant) Hiltan Pty Limited (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: F C Corsaro SC / A C Casselden (Plaintiff) B W Walker SC / T J Breakspear (First Defendant) D T Miller SC (Second Defendant) Solicitors: Swaab Attorneys (Plaintiff) King & Wood Mallesons (First Defendant) Colin Biggers & Paisley (Second Defendant) File Number(s): 2011/82598
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate