NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Satuala Nanai v Regina [2012] NSWCCA 141 Hearing dates: 06/06/2012 Decision date: 04 July 2012 Before: McClellan CJ at CL at 1 McDougall J at 2 Adamson J at 52 Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: [CRIMINAL LAW] - appeal - sentence - supply of not less than a commercial quantity of a prohibited drug and possession of an unauthorised pistol - whether sentencing judge erred in approach to accumulation and totality - whether error of kind in Muldrock v The Queen demonstrated - whether sentencing judge erred in engaging in a two-stage approach when sentencing the applicant - whether overall sentence manifestly excessive. Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: Cahyadi v R (2007) 168 A Crim R 41 Do v R [2010] NSWCCA 182 Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120 R v Zreika [2012] NSWCCA 44 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Satuala Nanai (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: C Smith (Applicant) S Dowling (Respondent) Solicitors: Legal Aid NSW (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2008/196649 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2012-11-12 00:00:00 Before: Finnane QC DCJ File Number(s): 2008/196649
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate