NSW Caselaw
Local Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Police v Beckett [2012] NSWLC 5 Hearing dates: 02/03/2012 Decision date: 29 June 2012 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Heilpern LCM Decision: The ERISP is admitted in evidence Catchwords: EVIDENCE - s 138 Evidence Act 1995 - admissibility of evidence improperly or illegally obtained - balancing exercise - whether desirability of admitting evidence outweighs undesirability of admitting evidence obtained improperly or illegally - failure of police to comply with LEPRA requirements - ALS not notified of Aboriginal defendant in custody for questioning - failure not deliberate - seriousness of offence charged Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 Cases Cited: Bunning v Cross (1978) 141 CLR 54 Campbell v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2008] NSWSC 1284 DPP v Carr [2002] NSWSC 194 Parker v Comptroller-General of Customs [2007] NSWCA 348 R v Ali Alkan [2010] NSWLC 1 R v APC & CP (District Court, unreported, 7 April 2006, Nicholson SC DCJ) R v Camilleri [2007] NSWCCA 36 R v Dalley [2002] NSWCCA 284 R v Dorothy Riley (District Court, unreported, 12 February 2002, Shadbolt DCJ) R v Helmhout [2000] NSWSC 208 R v Phan [2003] NSWCCA 205 Ridgeway v R (1995) 184 CLR 19 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Police Dennis Beckett (the defendant) Representation: Ms Kennedy for the Police Mr Behan for the defendant File Number(s): 2011/232421
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate