NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Dye v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2012] NSWCA 206 Hearing dates: 29 June 2012 Decision date: 29 June 2012 Before: Sackville AJA at [1] Decision: 1. Motion to adjourn application for leave to appeal dismissed. 2. Applicant to pay the Respondents' costs. [Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.] Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Vivienne Louise Dye (Applicant) Commonwealth Bank of Australia (First Respondent) Barbara Chapman (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Unrepresented (Applicant) P W J Gray SC (First and Second Respondents) M Richardson (First and Second Respondents) Solicitors: Unrepresented (Applicant) Clayton Utz (First and Second Respondents) File Number(s): 2009/297559 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9111 Citation: Dye v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2010] NSWSC 1238 Date of Decision: 2010-10-21 00:00:00 Before: McClellan CJ at CL File Number(s): 2009/297559
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate