NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: WHELAN, Heath Andrew v R [2012] NSWCCA 147 Hearing dates: 21 May 2012 Decision date: 04 July 2012 Before: Allsop P at [1] Davies J at [5] Schmidt J at [6] Decision: 1.That the conviction appeal be dismissed. 2.That the sentence appeal be dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - dangerous driving - foetus - child in utero - child born alive prematurely and later died - appeal against conviction - whether it was necessary to establish that the baby was injured in utero - whether it was necessary to establish that it was an intended act which caused the baby to be born - grounds not established - appeal against sentence - intensive correction order - whether sentence was manifestly inadequate - whether her Honour erred in determining the degree of moral culpability for this offence as being at a low level - grounds not established Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Regulation 2010 Cases Cited: Attorney-General's Reference (No 3 of 1994) [1998] AC 245 Attorney General's Reference (No 3 of 1994) [1996] QB 581 Campbell v The Queen (1980) 2 A Crim R 157 Dinsdale v R [2000] HCA 54; (2000) 203 CLR 321 DPP v Samadi [2006] NSWCCA 308 Hedges v Regina [2011] NSWCCA 263 Hili v R [2010] HCA 45 Mitreski v R; R v Mitreski [2008] NSWCCA 301 SKA v R [2011] HCA 13 R v Bateson [2011] NSWSC 643 R v Boughen; R v Cameron [2012] NSWCCA 17 R v F (1996) 40 NSWLR 245 R v Iby [2005] NSWCCA 178; (2005) 154 A Crim R 55 R v Jurisic (1998) 45 NSWLR 209; [1998] 101 A Crim R 259 R v King (2003) 59 NSWLR 472 R v Khatter [2000] NSWCCA 32 R v Radley [2010] NSWCCA 64 R v Townsend [2010] NSWCCA 336 R v West [1848] 175 RE 329; 2 Car & P 784, R v Whyte [2002] NSWCCA 343; (2002) 55 NSWLR 252 Royall v R [1991] HCA 27; (1991)172 CLR 378 Texts Cited: Archbold, 43rd edition Category: Principal judgment Parties: Heath Andrew Whelan (Appellant/Respondent) Regina (Crown) Representation: Counsel: B Greenhill SC (Appellant/Respondent) J Pickering (Crown) Solicitors: WG McNally Jones Staff (Appellant/Respondent) S Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2009/284939 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Citation: 2009/284939 Date of Decision: 2011-11-11 00:00:00 Before: Quirk DCJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate