NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Holt v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 770 Hearing dates: 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 25, 26, 27 and 28 June 2012 Decision date: 13 July 2012 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Adamson J Decision: (a)Verdict for the plaintiff. (b)Judgment for the plaintiff in an amount of $4,900. (c)The parties have leave to approach, at a time to be fixed, on the question of costs, including any special order as to costs. Catchwords: DEFAMATION - role of judge and jury - findings of fact made on question of damages must not be inconsistent with the verdict of the jury DEFAMATION - damages - mitigation - evidence - reputation - admissibility and relevance - relationship to "relevant sector" of reputation Legislation Cited: -Defamation Act 2005 Cases Cited: -ABC v McBride [2001] NSWCA 322; 53 NSWLR 430 -Ahmadi v Fairfax Media Publications [2010] NSWSC 702 -AK v Western Australia [2008] HCA 8; 232 CLR 438 -Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd v Marsden [2002] NSWCA 419 -Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 34; 60 CLR 336 -Carson v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd [1993] HCA 31; 178 CLR 44 -Cassell and Co Ltd v Broome [1972] AC 1027 -Channel Seven Sydney Pty Ltd v Mahommed [2010] NSWCA 335; 278 ALR 232 -Habib v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 924; 78 NSWLR 619 -Haertsch v Channel Nine Pty Ltd & Ors [2010] NSWSC 182 -John Fairfax and Sons v Kelly (1987) 8 NSWLR 131 -John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd v Zunter [2006] NSWCA 227 -Monteiro v R [2011] NSWCCA 113 -O'Hagan v Nationwide News Pty Limited [2001] NSWCA 302; 53 NSWLR 89 -Pamplin v Express Newspapers Ltd [1988] 1 WLR 116 -Rogers v Nationwide News Pty Limited [2003] HCA 52; 216 CLR 327 -Uren v John Fairfax & Sons Pty Ltd [1966] HCA 40; 117 CLR 118 Texts Cited: -Gatley on Libel and Slander (11th ed, 2008) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Andrew Holt (Plaintiff) TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd (First defendant) Nine Network Australia (Second defendant) Ben Fordham (Third defendant) Representation: Counsel: K Smark SC (Plaintiff) B McClintock SC/ M Richardson (Defendants) Solicitors: Fitzpatrick Solicitors Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Johnson Winter & Slattery (Defendants) File Number(s): 2010/114155
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate