NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Rydge v Byron Shire Council [2012] NSWLEC 155 Hearing dates: 12 June 2012; 13 June 2012 Decision date: 11 July 2012 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Lloyd AJ Decision: 1.The summons is dismissed. 2.The applicants must pay the respondents' costs. 3.The exhibits may be returned. Catchwords: JUDICIAL REVIEW - development consent for functions - permissibility of the development - use of lot in strata plan - whether consent of owner's corporation required - consistency with objectives of the zone - acoustic impact. Legislation Cited: Byron Local Environmental Plan 1988 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 82A, Cases Cited: Abret v Wingecarribee Shire Council [2011] NSWCA 107, 180 LGERA 343 Anderson v Director General of the Department of Environment and Climate Change [2008] NSWCA 337, 163 LGERA 400 Argyropoulos v Canterbury Municipal Council (1988) 66 LGERA 202 Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1998] 1 KB 223 Attorney General v Cooma Municipal Council (1961) 7 LGR (NSW) 115 Attorney General (NSW) v Quin (1990) 170 CLR 1 Bruce v Cole (1998) 45 NSWLR 163 Chamwell Pty Ltd v Strathfield Council [2007] NSWLEC 114; 151 LGERA 400 Enfield City Corporation v Development Assessment Commission [2000] HCA 5; (2000) 199 CLR 135 Hillpalm v Tweed Shire Council [2002] NSWCA 332 Hillpalm Pty Ltd v Tweed Shire Council [2002] NSWLEC 17; 119 LGERA 86 House of Peace v Bankstown City Council [2000] NSWCA 44; (2000) 48 NSWLR 498; 106 LGERA 440 Kindimindi Investments Ltd v Lane Cove Council [2006] NSWCA 23, 143 LGERA 277 Manly Council v Hortis [2001] NSWCA 81, 113 LGERA 321 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh (1995) 183 CLR 273 Murrumbidgee Groundwater Preservation Association Inc v Minister for Natural Resources [2005] NSWCA 10, 138 LGERA 11 North Sydney Council v Ligon 302 Pty Ltd (1996) 185 CLR 470; 91 LGERA 352 Owners Strata Plan 57762 v Pham [2005] NSWLEC 500 Warehouse Group (Australia) Pty Ltd v Woolworths Ltd [2005] NSWCA 269; (2005) 141 LGERA 376 Weal v Bathurst City Council [2000] NSWCA 88, 111 LGERA 187 Woolworths Ltd v Pallas Newco Pty Ltd [2004] NSWCA 422; 61 NSWLR 707 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Richard Anthony Ridge (first applicant) Terrence Mortimer O'Reilly and Helen Mary O'Reilly (second applicant) Byron Shire Council (first respondent) Timothy James Freedman (second respondent) Representation: Counsel Mr P R Clay SC /Mr M D Seymour (applicants) Mr C J Leggat SC/ Mr J L Doyle (second respondent) Solicitors Makinson & d'Apice (applicants) Marsdens Law Group (first respondent) Wall & Company Lawyers (second respondent) File Number(s): 40299 of 2012
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate