NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Nerez Grant v Gwendoline Peggy Hall & Ors [2012] NSWSC 779 Hearing dates: 20.06.12 Decision date: 11 July 2012 Before: Nicholas J Decision: Par 31 Catchwords: PROCEDURE - security for costs - inherent jurisdiction - plaintiff's impecuniosity not a determinative discretionary factor - whether additional factors favouring order for security established - turns on facts - no question of general principle Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 Crown Lands Act 1989 Real Property Act 1900 Residential Tenancies Act 2010 Cases Cited: Bhagat v Murphy [2000] NSWSC 892 Chang v Comcare Australia [1999] FCA 1677 Grant v Baulkham Hills Shire Council [2000] NSWSC 28; (2000) 10 BPR 18,155 Grant v Baulkham Hills Shire Council [2001] NSWCA 107 Green v CGU Insurance Ltd [2008] NSWCA 148; (2008) 67 ACSR 105 Jeffery & Katauskas Pty Ltd v SST Consulting Pty Ltd [2009] HCA 43; (2009) 239 CLR 75 Merribee Pastoral Industries Pty Ltd v ANZ Banking Group Ltd [1998] HCA 41; (1998) 193 CLR 502 Morris v Hanley [2000] NSWSC 957 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Nerez Grant - plaintiff Gwendoline Peggy Hall - first defendant State of New South Wales - second defendant Registrar-General of New South Wales - third defendant Representation: Counsel: F Assaf - plaintiff M Wright - first defendant Solicitors: Jackson Lalic Lawyers - plaintiff Chalk & Fitzgerald - first defendant File Number(s): 12/39345
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate