NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Bird v Cannington [2012] NSWSC 789 Hearing dates: 27 June 2012 Decision date: 10 July 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Rein J Decision: 1. Plaintiff's application dismissed. 2. Plaintiff to pay the defendants' costs on the usual basis. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - judgments and orders - setting aside - where plaintiff claims that orders were obtained against good faith - where plaintiff seeks to set aside orders on basis of non-disclosure or misrepresentation by silence - no evidence that orders were obtained by misconduct or dishonourable conduct - no misconduct established and no linkage established between alleged non-disclosure or misrepresentation by silence and procurement of the orders - no evidence of mistake in relation to the orders made by consent on the discontinuance of preliminary discovery proceedings
PROCEDURE - order for costs against third parties - where there had been no hearing on the merits, a discontinuance filed and agreement that each party bear their own costs - where there is no evidence that the third parties knew of the proceedings, the discontinuance or agreement on costs - no basis for costs order against the third parties Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Bird v Bird (No 4) [2012] NSWSC 646 Bird v Bird (No 5) [2012] NSWSC 734 Cash v Wells (1830) 1 B & Ad 374; (1830) 109 ER 826 CG Maloney Pty Ltd v Noon [2011] NSWCA 397 Champerslife Pty Ltd v Manojlovski [2010] NSWCA 33; (2010) 75 NSWLR 245 Coles v Burke (1987) 10 NSWLR 429 Connectland Pty Ltd v Cardno Forbes Rigby Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 391 FPM Constructions v Council of the City of Blue Mountains [2005] NSWCA 340 Harvey v Phillips (1956) 95 CLR 235 Jeffery & Katauskas Pty Ltd v SST Consulting Pty Ltd; Jeffery & Katauskas Pty Ltd v Rickard Constructions Pty Ltd (subject to Deed of Company Arrangement) [2009] HCA 43; (2009) 239 CLR 75 Kendall v Carnegie [2006] NSWCA 302; (2006) 68 NSWLR 193 Knight v FP Special Assets Ltd (1992) 174 CLR 178 Land Enviro Corp Pty Limited v HTT Huntley Heritage Pty Limited [2012] NSWSC 382 May v Christodoulou [2011] NSWCA 75 Re Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs; Ex parte Lai Qin [1997] HCA 6; (1997) 186 CLR 622 Perpetual Trustees Australia Ltd v Heperu Pty Ltd (No 2) (2009) 78 NSWLR 190 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd [1981] HCA 45; (1981) 147 CLR 589 Roach v B & W Steel Pty Ltd (1991) 23 NSWLR 110 Shirriff v Nominal Defendant [1999] NSWCA 152 Silvera v Savic [1999] NSWSC 83; (1999) 46 NSWLR 124 Singh v Ginelle Pty Ltd [2010] NSWCA 310 Teoh v Hunters Hill Council (No 5) [2012] NSWCA 75 Texts Cited: LexisNexis, Ritchie's Uniform Civil Procedure NSW, Vol 1 (at Service 67) Category: Consequential orders Parties: Deborah Michelle Bird (Plaintiff) Herbert James Cannington (First defendant) Warrick Lindsay Bird and Rodney David Bird (Third parties) Representation: Counsel: J S Drummond (Plaintiff) C Champion (First defendant) D E Grieve QC and M K Condon (Third parties) Solicitors: Wilson & Co Lawyers (Plaintiff) Middletons (First defendant) Hills Solicitors (Third parties) File Number(s): SC 2005/262269
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate