NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Nguyen v R [2012] NSWCCA 152 Hearing dates: 10 July 2012 Decision date: 18 July 2012 Before: HOEBEN JA; at [1] LATHAM J; at [63] GARLING J; at [64] Decision: Leave to appeal is granted. The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence appeal - offence contrary to s 400.3(2) Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) of dealing with $1 million or more, being reckless as to the risk that the money will become an instrument of crime - whether sentence manifestly excessive - $9.9 million dealt with in 23 days - assessment of objective seriousness of offence - extent to which suspicion as to source of funds relevant - relevance of covert features of offence - use of strong subjective case - use of statistics. Legislation Cited: Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) - s 400.3(2) Cases Cited: A Ansari v R, H Ansari v R [2007] NSWCCA 204; 70 NSWLR 89 House v King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 R v Van Loi Nguyen [2010] NSWCCA 226; 204 A Crim R 246 Regina v Narongchai Saengsai-Or [2004] NSWCCA 108; 147 A Crim R 172 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Thi Thom Dao Nguyen - Applicant Commonwealth - Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: Mr P Boulten - Applicant Mr CB Craigie SC/Mr S Buchen - Respondent Crown Solicitors: Ly Lawyers - Applicant Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions - Respondent Crown File Number(s): 2010/67373 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2011-03-04 00:00:00 Before: King SC DCJ File Number(s): 2010/67373
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate