NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Younan v R [2012] NSWCCA 155 Hearing dates: 10 July 2012 Decision date: 18 July 2012 Before: Hoeben JA Latham J Garling J Decision: Leave to appeal allowed Appeal dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against sentence - importing a marketable quantity of heroin s 307.2 (1) of the Criminal Code (Cth) - whether trial judge erred in application of Ellis discount - whether trial judge erred in failing to find applicant was remorseful - whether sentence was manifestly excessive -- undue weight was not placed on general deterrence - no scope for finding remorse after conviction at trial - sentence imposed was at the very bottom of the range - appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act (Cth) 1990 Cases Cited: R v Ellis (1986) 6 NSWLR 603 R v Borkowski [2009] NSWCCA 102 Raad v R [2011] NSWCCA 138 R v Rushby [1977] 1 NSWLR 594 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Aram Younan - Applicant Regina - Respondent Representation: Counsel M Smith - Applicant CP O'Donnell - Respondent Solicitors CrimLaw (NSW) Pty Ltd - Applicant Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions - Respondent File Number(s): 2009/58589 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2010-11-17 00:00:00 Before: Flannery SC DCJ File Number(s): 2009/0058589004
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate