NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Slaveski v Connell [2012] NSWSC 810 Hearing dates: 16 July 2012 Decision date: 16 July 2012 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Beech-Jones J Decision: Proceedings dismissed. Catchwords: JUDICIAL REVIEW - Appeal from interlocutory Local Court decision to refuse to require prosecution witnesses to give oral evidence at committal hearing - Table 1 offences dropped - committal hearing dispensed with - whether appeal against ruling frivolous - whether adjournment should be granted. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 - s 59(2), s 60, s 93C(1) Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 - s 53(3) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 - s 91, s 260 Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 - s 32 Road Rules 2008 - cl 265 Summary Offences Act 1988 - s 4A Supreme Court Act 1970 - s 69 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 - r 13.4 Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] HCA 33; (1990) 170 CLR 321 McBain, Re; Ex parte Australian Catholic Bishops Conference [2002] HCA 16; (2002) 209 CLR 372 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs, Re; Ex parte Applicants S134/2002 [2003] HCA 1; (2003) 211 CLR 441 Slaveski v Longley LCM [2011] NSWSC 933 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Ljupco Slaveski (First Plaintiff) Angeleska Snezana (Second Plaintiff) Magistrate Conell (First Defendant) Director of Public Prosecutions (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: No appearance for Plaintiffs Submitting appearance (First Defendant) Ms C.A. Webster (Second Defendant) Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Second Defendant) File Number(s): 2011/289669
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate