Re Dovico; Ex Parte Mayne Wetherall [2012] NSWSC 822

Supreme Court New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Re Dovico; Ex Parte Mayne Wetherall [2012] NSWSC 822 Hearing dates: 9 July 2012 Decision date: 20 July 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Corporations List Before: Young AJ Decision: Applicant as recipient of an Australian subpoena in New Zealand is entitled to be paid its claim for loss and expense in complying. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Subpoena served in New Zealand - Basis for calculating recoverable loss and expense in complying Legislation Cited: Evidence and Procedure (New Zealand) Act 1994 (Cth) Evidence Amendment Act 1994 (NZ) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 33.11 Cases Cited: A Pty Ltd v Z [2007] NSWSC 999 Bank of New South Wales v Withers (1981) 35 ALR 21; 52 FLR 207 Danieletto v Khera (1995) 35 NSWLR 684 Deposit & Investment Co Ltd v Peat Marwick Mitchell & Co (1996) 39 NSWLR 267 Hadid v Lenfest Communications Inc (1996) 65 FCR 350; 144 ALR 73 J Aron Corporation v Newmont Yandal Operations Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 996 Mancorp Pty Ltd v Baulderstone Pty Ltd (Unreported, Supreme Court of South Australia, Debelle J, 5 March 1993) Moriarty v Moriarty [2009] FamCA 369; 243 FLR 409; 41 Fam LR 336 Triotas Pty Ltd v Rohn (Unreported, Supreme Court of New South Wales, Young J, 20 May 1993) Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Mayne Wetherell, Solicitors, Auckland, NZ (Applicant) Paul Dovico (Respondent) Representation: TJS French (Applicant) R Travers (Solicitor) (Respondent) Eakin McCaffery Cox (Applicant) Legal Ease Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2012/27761