NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Michael Perigo v Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer and Anor (No 2) [2012] NSWSC 830 Hearing dates: 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 July 2011, 5 August 2011 Decision date: 16 July 2012 Before: McCallum J Decision: Verdict for the plaintiff apportioned as follows: 25% against the first defendant; 75% against the second defendant. Plaintiff held not to have been contributorily negligent. Catchwords: TORTS - negligence - duty of care - principal and subcontractor - existence of duty and content of duty - application of Leighton v Fox - standard of care - assumption by principal of responsibility to devise and supervise system of works - knowledge of defect in system - whether breach of duty established - TORTS - adjustment of liability between principal and employer - non-delegable duty of employer owed to employee - TORTS - contributory negligence - experienced scaffolder - tedious, repetitive and physically demanding work - DAMAGES - apportionment. Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946, s 6(4), s 5 Workers Compensation Act 1987, s 151Z(1)(d) Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 Occupational Health and Safety Regulation 2001 Cases Cited: Adeels Palace Pty Ltd v Moubarak; Adeels Palace Pty Ltd v Bou Najem [2009] HCA 48 Autodesk Inc v Dyason [1993] HCA 6; (1992) 176 CLR 300 Calliden Insurance Ltd v Fox [2009] HCA 35; (2009) 240 CLR 1 Commissioner of Railways v Ruprecht (1979) 142 CLR 563 Fitzgerald v Penn (1954) 91 CLR 268 at 277; [1954] HCA 74 Hamilton v Nuroof (WA) Pty Ltd (1956) 96 CLR 18 Jeffs v Rio Tinto Ltd & Anor [2010] NSWSC 1046 Jigsaw Property Group Pty Ltd v Barahona; Pacific Steel Constructions Pty Ltd v Barahona [2009] NSWCA 406 Kuhl v Financial Services Australia Ltd [2011] HCA 11; (2011) 276 ALR 375 Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd v Fox [2009] HCA 35; (2009) 240 CLR 1 March v Stramare (E & M H) Pty Ltd (1991) 171 CLR 506 at 515; [1991] HCA 12 McLean v Tedman [1984] HCA 60; (1984) 155 CLR 306 Modbury Triangle Shopping Centre Pty Ltd v Anzil [2005] HCA 61; (2005) 205 CLR 254 New South Wales Bar Association v Smith, NSW Court of Appeal, 4 July 1991 (unreported) Price v State of New South Wales [2011] NSWCA 341 Roche Mining Pty Ltd v Jeffs [2011] NSWCA 184 Rockdale Beef Pty Ltd v Carey [2003] NSWCA 132 Sungravure Pty Ltd v Meani (1964) 110 CLR 24 Stevens v Brodribb Sawmilling Co Pty Ltd (1986) 160 CLR 16 The Council of the Shire of Wyong v Shirt & Ors [1980] HCA 12; 146 CLR 40 Tolhurst v Cleary Brothers (Bombo) Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 181 Unilever Australia Ltd v Pahi; Swire Cold Storage Pty Ltd v Pahi [2010] NSWCA 149 Waverley Council v Ferreira [2005] NSWCA 341 Wynbergen v Hoyts Corporation Pty Ltd [1997] HCA 52; (1997) 149 ALR 25 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Michael Perigo (plaintiff) Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer (first defendant/cross claimant) Waco Kwikform Pty Limited (second defendant/cross defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Wheelahan with D L Del Monte (plaintiff) D Kelly (first defendant/cross claimant) J Chapman (second defendant/cross defendant) Solicitors: Maurice Blackburn (plaintiff) Gillis Delaney Lawyers (first defendant/cross claimant) Yeldham Price O'Brien Lusk (second defendant/cross defendant) File Number(s): 2009/297523 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate