NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Barry v Borlas Pty Limited & Ors [2012] NSWSC 831 Hearing dates: 12 July 2012 Decision date: 12 July 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Duty List Before: White J Decision: Make orders 1, 3 and 4 in accordance with the summons. Catchwords: TRUSTS - discretionary trusts - power of court to approve advantageous dealings - alteration of powers conferred on trustees - application by trustee to amend vesting day notwithstanding clause that trustee does not have power to vary trust deed insofar as it fixes vesting day - beneficiaries of trust support proposal - whether in the court's opinion it is expedient that the transaction take place - whether proposed amendment in management and administration of trust property - amendment to advance objectives of trust and minimise tax impacts - s 81 Trustee Act 1925 (NSW) Legislation Cited: Trustee Act 1925 Cases Cited: Stein v Sybmore Holdings [2006] NSWSC 1004 Perpetual Trustees WA Limited v Attorney-General (Western Australia) (1992) 8 WAR 441 Riddle v Riddle [1952] HCA 12; (1952) 85 CLR 202 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Robert Hugh Barry (Plaintiff) Borlas Pty Limited (1st Defendant) Nicholas Hugh Barry (2nd Defendant) Kate Elizabeth McFadyen (3rd Defendant) Andrew McCowan Barry (4th Defendant) Sabrina Gai Barry (5th Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Barlin (Plaintiff) M Bennett (Defendants) Solicitors: D H Dwyer Forbes & Yeo (Plaintiff) File Number(s): 2012/164816
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate