NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Welker v Rinehart (No 9) [2012] NSWSC 839 Hearing dates: 9 May 2012, written submissions 11 May 2012 Decision date: 25 July 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Brereton J Decision: The First Defendant produce the document sought Catchwords: PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Notice to produce documents - Uniform Civil Procedure Rules r 21.10(1)(a) - whether document or thing referred to
PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Notice to produce documents - application to set aside - defect in form - whether substantial compliance with rule is sufficient - UCPR r 21.10
PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Notice to produce documents - application to set aside - whether time for compliance is reasonable - UCPR r 21.11 Legislation Cited: (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 21.10, r 21.11(1), r 34.1 (NSW) Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 68 Cases Cited: Welker v Rinehart [2012] NSWSC 588 Bidald Consulting Pty Ltd v Miles Special Builders Pty Ltd [2005] NSWSC 977 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Hope Rinehart Welker (First plaintiff) John Langley Hancock (Second plaintiff) Bianca Hope Rinehart (Third plaintiff) Gina Hope Rinehart (First Defendant) Ginia Hope Frances Rinehart (Second defendant) Representation: Counsel: Dr A Bell SC w Mr DFC Thomas (Plaintiffs) Mr S Rushton SC w Mr C Bova (First defendant) Mr W Flynn (Second defendant) Solicitors: Johnson Winter & Slattery (Plaintiffs) Corrs Chambers Westgarth (First defendant) Gadens (Second defendant) File Number(s): 2011/285907
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate