NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Lal v Patel; Patel v Lal (No 2) [2012] NSWCA 226 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 26 July 2012 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1] Sackville AJA at [5] Decision: (1) Strike out the Notice of Appeal as incompetent. (2) Order the appellants to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal. (3) Dismiss the application for leave to appeal with costs. [Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.] Catchwords: APPEAL - application for leave to appeal dismissed - no issue of principle Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Patricia Lal (First Applicant) Hasmukh Lal (Second Applicant) Jaswanti Patel (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Applicants in person M Suliman (Solicitor) (Respondent) Solicitors: Applicants in person M Suliman (Respondent) File Number(s): CA 2012/49614; CA 2011/305566 Decision under appeal Citation: Patel v Lal [2011] NSWSC 603; Patel v Lal [2011] NSWSC 678 Before: Biscoe AJ File Number(s): SC 2009/290378
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate