NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Taylor v The Owners - Strata Plan No 11564 [2012] NSWSC 842 Hearing dates: 30/03/2012 Decision date: 27 July 2012 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Garling J Decision: Order that the separate question be answered as set out in [83]. Order the plaintiffs to pay the defendant's costs. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - Statutory Interpretation - claim for damages under Compensation to Relatives Act 1987 - Civil Liability Act 2002 - whether Part 2 applies to such proceedings - whether the limit imposed by s 12(2) applies to loss of expectation of financial support from the deceased - meaning of "claimant" in s 12(2) Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 Compensation to Relatives Act 1987 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules Cases Cited: Carr v Western Australia [2007] HCA 47; (2007) 232 CLR 138 Carroll v Purcell [1961] HCA 81; (1961) 107 CLR 73 Chaina v The Presbyterian Church (NSW) Property Trust [2007] NSWSC 353; (2007) 69 NSWLR 533 Commissioner for Railways (NSW) v Agalianos [1955] HCA 27; (1955) 92 CLR 390 De Sales v IngrilIi [2002] HCA 52; (2002) 212 CLR 338 Dossett v TKJ Nominees Pty Ltd [2003] HCA 69; (2003) 218 CLR 1 Dwight v Bouchier [2003] NSWCA 3 Eastman v The Queen [2000] HCA 29; (2000) 203 CLR 1 Harrison v Melhem (2008) 72 NSWLR 380 Idoport Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank [2000] NSWSC 1215 Kingston v Keprose Pty Ltd (1987) 11 NSWLR 404 Mangion v James Hardie & Co Pty Ltd (1990) 20 NSWLR 100 Nolan v Clifford [1904] HCA 15; (1904) 1 CLR 429; Parker v The Commonwealth [1965] HCA 12; (1965) 112 CLR 295 Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth [2003] HCA 2; (2003) 211 CLR 476 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28; (1998) 194 CLR 355 R v PLV [2001] NSWCCA 282; (2001) 51 NSWLR 736 Re Bolton; Ex Parte Beane [1987] HCA 12; (1987) 162 CLR 514 Ross v The Queen [1979] HCA 29; (1979) 141 CLR 432 Tallglen Pty Ltd v Pay TV Holdings Pty Ltd (1996) 22 ACSR 130 Thiering v Daly [2011] NSWSC 1348 Wik Peoples v Queensland [1996] HCA 40; (1996) 187 CLR 1 Wilson v State Rail Authority of NSW [2010] NSWCA 198 Category: Separate question Parties: S Taylor (P) (proceedings 10/405732) L Taylor (P1) (proceedings 12/57679) M Taylor (P2) (proceedings 12/57679) The Owners - SP No 11564 (D1) (proceedings 12/57679) A Lamond (D2) G Sunn (D3) C Sunn (D4) D Rae (D5) Manly Council (D6) R Taylor (D7) Representation: Counsel: J Poulos QC / V Heath / N Broadbent (P) (proceedings 10/405732) Mr Butcher (P1, P2) (proceedings 12/57679) G M Gregg / J Maconachie (D1, D2, D3, D4) (proceedings 10/405732 and 12/57679) J Lonergan / H Chiu (D5) (proceedings 10/405732 and 12/57679) S Glascott (D6) (proceedings 10/405732 and 12/57679) Solicitors: Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers (P) (proceedings 10/405732) Milne Berry & Berger (P1, P2) (proceedings 12/57679) Meridian Lawyers (D1, D2, D3, D4) (proceedings 12/57679) Addisons (D5) (proceedings 12/57679) DLA Piper Australia (D6) (proceedings 12/57679) File Number(s): 2010/405732; 2012/57679
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate